Baldwin Investment Management, LLC

 

 

WHY NO ZEST IN THE MARKETS?

 

The third quarter results are in and the U.S. markets as measured by the Dow and the S&P 500 have continued to go nowhere and the more growth oriented, technology based NASDAQ slipped by about 6% year-to-date.  These disappointing results have come in the face of rather strong GDP and earnings growth, which handily beat Wall Street expectations.  It has been a curious performance.

 

            There have been some economic statistics, which some experts consider troubling.  Probably the biggest focus was the jobs (or according to some, lack of jobs) picture.  Coming off extremely robust monthly employment numbers (200,000 jobs created) earlier in the year, the rate of job creation has slowed (70,000 new ones).  However, the Federal Reserve chairman, Mr. Greenspan, does not seem concerned.  In his recent testimony before Congress, Mr. Greenspan discussed at length the “soft spot” but suggested that it was a temporary phenomenon and maintained that the American economic engine would soon again be running at a higher speed.  We too are convinced that the U.S. economy is not in any trouble.

 

The Fed has been busy increasing interest rates.  We have now seen three (3) interest rate hikes of ¼ of 1% and the Federal Funds rate stands at 1.75% - up from its starting point of 1%.  Mr. Greenspan announced the most recent move in September, even after quite a few economists worried aloud about a softening of the U.S. economy.  Obviously, Mr. Greenspan was not as concerned and thought it wiser that interest rates continue to rise in a “measured” fashion, so that the “inflation genie” does not get out of the bottle.  Surprisingly, in the face of increasing Fed Funds rates, notes and bonds have actually increased in price, i.e. interest rates have gone down.  This has been an odd turn of events to many experts, as it does not follow historical precedent.  In the past, when the Fed has increased the Fed Funds rate, all other rates have gone up in lockstep.  So far the opposite has been true.  Two influences might be at work here.  First, we must remember that the increase in interest rates is starting from an extraordinarily low base – i.e. 1%.  This level of Fed Funds was unprecedented as the Fed drove interest rates down to prevent deflation.  Interest rates, even at 1.75%, are below the current inflation rate (approximately 2 ½%) and the Fed wants to achieve neutrality – i.e. the Fed Funds rate equal to the inflation rate.  So, it could be argued that with the Fed raising interest rates to at least a neutral position before there is any sign of increasing inflation, the Fed is acting to curb inflation and thus bond traders are happy to own bonds.  Another explanation might be “the carry trade”.  When it was feared that the Fed would dramatically raise interest rates in the Spring, bond traders unwound positions sending yields higher.  After it became evident that the Fed was not going to raise interest rates quickly, bond traders started to dip their toes back in the water and borrow money at inexpensive rates to buy longer dated bonds at higher yields - working the spread of interest rates between the two pieces of paper.  Eventually when interest rates reach neutrality, interest rates will go up and bond prices will dip.  So in spite of the short term anomalous situation that the bond market finds itself in at the moment, we would expect that bonds will revert to the norm in the face of rising interest rates promulgated by the Federal Reserve.

 

Certainly making a lot of headlines today is the price of oil as it trades above $50 a barrel.  Because our economy has become far more fuel efficient, no longer do people seem to be concerned that oil trading at such levels would create inflation problems.  Rather, most experts are concerned that if oil were to stay at these levels, eventually it could slow the U.S. economy, perhaps demonstrably.  We contend that there is no fundamental reason for the price of oil to be at these high levels.  Oil inventories are sufficient around the world and refinery systems are working “without a hitch”.  Certainly there continues to be sabotage of Iraqi pipelines and hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as political disruption in Nigeria.  Nevertheless, the world has lived with disruptions caused by nature in the past and oil companies have continued to pump crude out of the Nigerian delta for years despite periodic political difficulties.  In spite of sabotage, oil is coming out of Iraq.  It does get interrupted but pipelines are fairly quickly repaired.  In an effort to reduce the price, most members of OPEC, especially the Saudis, have ramped up production and are now producing way above their official quotas and even above their “cheating” quotas.  But it all seems to be to no avail as the price continues to rise.  There is a “security premium” which has been introduced to the marketplace by oil traders and hedge funds.  Various experts would argue that this security premium is valued at anywhere from $10 to $20 per barrel.  These traders are playing on fears of supply disruption and the image of gas lines down American streets.  There was a recent article in the Financial Times, which discussed a new conclusion by the U.S. government – the final arbiter of adequate crude inventory in the U.S.  In 1998 the U.S. government determined that for the American refinery system to work well the U.S. needed to have approximately 270 million barrels of crude oil in storage.  In the ensuing years since 1998, the oil refinery system has become more efficient because oil companies were not interested in holding inventories due to the backwardation[1] of the oil price curve.  Consequently, the U.S. government is about to issue a report that will say that the appropriate amount of inventory has been reduced to 250 million barrels.  According to the most recent inventory statistic reported, U.S. inventories now stand at 269.5 million barrels – i.e. the American refinery system is well supplied and there should be no particular worries.  Hopefully, somebody in the futures pits will focus on this key statistic.

 

Lastly, election fever has hit and November will soon be upon us.  Mr. Bush seems to be in the lead at the moment on the eve of the first Presidential debate.  The equity markets both here and abroad would seem to favor a Bush victory because his presidency has certainly been more “investor” friendly.  Mr. Kerry is not as well liked by most market makers.  So with polls indicating that Mr. Bush is in the lead, markets would tend to do better and with Mr. Kerry in the lead markets would tend to do worse.  It has been historically true that it doesn’t matter which party is occupying the White House. So once we get beyond the election, at least that bit of investor uncertainty (i.e. who is going to be president), will be out of the way.  We still believe that Mr. Bush will win the election and as we noted on our predictions, “by a landslide”.

 

The U.S. economy continues to gather some steam.  Inflation is not a worry.  Interest rates are still low, but are rising.  World trade is extremely strong.  The price of oil is at a very inflated level and we (like so many others) believe it must go down.  The operative question is when?  Headlines continue to be disturbing, especially about Iraq.  The presidential political season is in full swing and the mud slinging is getting torqued up.  The fundamentals would suggest good returns in the stock market.  The noise in the newspapers and over the television nightly news has drowned out the positives for now – but they will surface in the near future.

 

 

 

PREDICTIONS 2004

 

 

PREDICTIONS                                                                                                                     COMMENTS

 

1)  The dollar will regain some its former glory, trading closer to $1.15/Euro                  The Dollar has Weakened

 

2)  President George W. Bush will be re-elected to office by a landslide                         Still Believe

 

3)  Economic growth in the U.S. will top 4% year over year                                          Indicators Look Good

 

4)  In spite of strong economic growth, inflation will remain quiescent                             Little Pricing Pressure, except in Commodities

 

5)  Interest rates will stay low at least until the 4th quarter & will rise                               Wrong- rates lifted by .75% & expected to go

        after November 8th                                                                                                  Higher

 

6)  Osama will be sold out and captured (we’re sticking with this!)                                 The Cynic in Me says Yes

 

7)  Progress will be made in North Korea with difficulty                                                 A Boring Process, made more difficult recently

 

8)  There will be additional but fewer corporate scandals than during 2003                     Recent examples include Nortel, Fannie Mae,                                                                                                                                            Computer Associates

 

9)  Commodity prices will be strong throughout 2004                                                    Some were Blazing Hot, but have Cooled a

   Bit

 

10)  The Japanese economy will improve, strengthening world economic growth            Getting Better

 

 


A FINAL THOUGHT

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

 

The opinions expressed in this Commentary are those of Baldwin Investment Management, LLC.  These views are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.

 

The reported numbers enclosed are derived from sources believed to be reliable, however, we cannot guarantee their accuracy.  Past performance does not guarantee future results.

 

A list of our Proxy voting procedures is available upon request.

 

A current copy of our ADV Part II is available upon request or at www.baldwinim.com/disclosure.htm                                                                                  9//30/04



[1] Backwardation describes a phenomenon in the futures market when near dated crude oil contracts are priced more expensively than far dated contracts.  Consequently, oil companies have no incentive to hold large oil inventories; because they become less valuable as time marches on.